Ecology

Dissimilarity of species interaction networks: quantifying the effect of turnover and rewiring

10.24072/pcjournal.105 - Peer Community Journal, Volume 2 (2022), article no. e35.

Get full text PDF Peer reviewed and recommended by PCI

Despite having established its usefulness in the last ten years, the decomposition of ecological networks in components allowing to measure their β-diversity retains some methodological ambiguities. Notably, how to quantify the relative effect of mechanisms tied to interaction rewiring vs. species turnover has been interpreted differently by different authors. In this contribution, I present mathematical arguments and numerical experiments that should (i) establish that the decomposition of networks as it is currently done is indeed fit for purpose, and (ii) provide guidelines to interpret the values of the components tied to turnover and rewiring.

 

Published online:
DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.105
Poisot, Timothée 1

1 Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Canada
License: CC-BY 4.0
Copyrights: The authors retain unrestricted copyrights and publishing rights
@article{10_24072_pcjournal_105,
     author = {Poisot, Timoth\'ee},
     title = {Dissimilarity of species interaction networks: quantifying the effect of turnover and rewiring},
     journal = {Peer Community Journal},
     eid = {e35},
     publisher = {Peer Community In},
     volume = {2},
     year = {2022},
     doi = {10.24072/pcjournal.105},
     url = {https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.105/}
}
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dissimilarity of species interaction networks: quantifying the effect of turnover and rewiring
JO  - Peer Community Journal
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022///
VL  - 2
PB  - Peer Community In
UR  - https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.105/
UR  - https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.105
DO  - 10.24072/pcjournal.105
ID  - 10_24072_pcjournal_105
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%T Dissimilarity of species interaction networks: quantifying the effect of turnover and rewiring
%J Peer Community Journal
%D 2022
%V 2
%I Peer Community In
%U https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.105
%R 10.24072/pcjournal.105
%F 10_24072_pcjournal_105
Poisot, Timothée. Dissimilarity of species interaction networks: quantifying the effect of turnover and rewiring. Peer Community Journal, Volume 2 (2022), article  no. e35. doi : 10.24072/pcjournal.105. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.105/

Peer reviewed and recommended by PCI : 10.24072/pci.ecology.100092

[1] Baronio, G. J.; Souza, C. S.; Maruyama, P. K.; Raizer, J.; Sigrist, M. R.; Aoki, C. Natural fire does not affect the structure and beta diversity of plant-pollinator networks, but diminishes floral-visitor specialization in Cerrado, Flora, Volume 281 (2021) | DOI

[2] Bezanson, J.; Edelman, A.; Karpinski, S.; Shah, V. B. Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing, SIAM Review, Volume 59 (2017) no. 1, pp. 65-98 | DOI

[3] Campos‐Moreno, D. F.; Dyer, L. A.; Salcido, D.; Massad, T. J.; Pérez‐Lachaud, G.; Tepe, E. J.; Whitfield, J. B.; Pozo, C. Importance of interaction rewiring in determining spatial and temporal turnover of tritrophic (Piper‐caterpillar‐parasitoid) metanetworks in the Yucatán Península, México, Biotropica, Volume 53 (2021) no. 4, pp. 1071-1081 | DOI

[4] Canard, E. F.; Mouquet, N.; Mouillot, D.; Stanko, M.; Miklisova, D.; Gravel, D. Empirical Evaluation of Neutral Interactions in Host-Parasite Networks, The American Naturalist, Volume 183 (2014) no. 4, pp. 468-479 | DOI

[5] Dunne, J. A. The Network Structure of Food Webs. In: Ecological networks: Linking structure and dynamics (eds. Dunne, J.A. & Pascual, M.) (2006), pp. 27-86

[6] Fründ, J. Dissimilarity of species interaction networks: how to partition rewiring and species turnover components, Ecosphere, Volume 12 (2021) no. 7 | DOI

[7] Gowda, S.; Ma, Y.; Cheli, A.; Gwozdz, M.; Shah, V.; Edelman, A.; Rackauckas, C. High-performance symbolic-numerics via multiple dispatch, arXiv (2021) ( http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.0394)

[8] Higino, G. T.; Poisot, T. Beta and phylogenetic diversities tell complementary stories about ecological networks biogeography, Parasitology, Volume 148 (2021) no. 7, pp. 835-842 | DOI

[9] Koleff, P.; Gaston, K. J.; Lennon, J. J. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data, Journal of Animal Ecology, Volume 72 (2003) no. 3, pp. 367-382 | DOI

[10] Legendre, P.; De Cáceres, M. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning, Ecology Letters, Volume 16 (2013) no. 8, pp. 951-963 | DOI

[11] Magrach, A.; Holzschuh, A.; Bartomeus, I.; Riedinger, V.; Roberts, S. P. M.; Rundlöf, M.; Vujić, A.; Wickens, J. B.; Wickens, V. J.; Bommarco, R.; González-Varo, J. P.; Potts, S. G.; Smith, H. G.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Vilà, M. Plant-pollinator networks in semi-natural grasslands are resistant to the loss of pollinators during blooming of mass-flowering crops, Ecography, Volume 41 (2017) no. 1, pp. 62-74 | DOI

[12] Ohlmann, M.; Mazel, F.; Chalmandrier, L.; Bec, S.; Coissac, E.; Gielly, L.; Pansu, J.; Schilling, V.; Taberlet, P.; Zinger, L.; Chave, J.; Thuiller, W. Mapping the imprint of biotic interactions on β-diversity, Ecology Letters, Volume 21 (2018) no. 11, pp. 1660-1669 | DOI

[13] Olsson, R. L.; Brousil, M. R.; Clark, R. E.; Baine, Q.; Crowder, D. W. Interactions between plants and pollinators across urban and rural farming landscapes, Food Webs, Volume 27 (2021) | DOI

[14] Poisot, T.; Canard, E.; Mouillot, D.; Mouquet, N.; Gravel, D. The dissimilarity of species interaction networks, Ecology Letters, Volume 15 (2012) no. 12, pp. 1353-1361 | DOI

[15] Poisot, T.; Cirtwill, A. R.; Cazelles, K.; Gravel, D.; Fortin, M.; Stouffer, D. B. The structure of probabilistic networks, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Volume 7 (2016) no. 3, pp. 303-312 | DOI

[16] Poisot, T.; Guéveneux-Julien, C.; Fortin, M.-J.; Gravel, D.; Legendre, P. Hosts, parasites and their interactions respond to different climatic variables, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Volume 26 (2017) no. 8, pp. 942-951 | DOI

[17] Poisot, T.; Stouffer, D. B.; Gravel, D. Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time, Oikos, Volume 124 (2015) no. 3, pp. 243-251 | DOI

[18] Souza, C. S.; Maruyama, P. K.; Santos, K. C. B. S.; Varassin, I. G.; Gross, C. L.; Araujo, A. C. Plant‐centred sampling estimates higher beta diversity of interactions than pollinator‐based sampling across habitats, New Phytologist, Volume 230 (2021) no. 6, pp. 2501-2512 | DOI

[19] Trøjelsgaard, K.; Olesen, J. M. Ecological networks in motion: micro‐ and macroscopic variability across scales, Functional Ecology, Volume 30 (2016) no. 12, pp. 1926-1935 | DOI

[20] Tuomisto, H. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity, Ecography, Volume 33 (2010) no. 1, pp. 2-22 | DOI

[21] Wilson, M. V.; Shmida, A. Measuring Beta Diversity with Presence-Absence Data, The Journal of Ecology, Volume 72 (1984) no. 3 | DOI

Cited by Sources: