Do the more flexible individuals rely more on causal cognition? Observation versus intervention in causal inference in great-tailed grackles

10.24072/pcjournal.44 - Peer Community Journal, Volume 1 (2021), article no. e50.

Get full text PDF Peer reviewed and recommended by PCI

Behavioral flexibility, the ability to change behavior when circumstances change based on learning from previous experience, is thought to play an important role in a species ability to successfully adapt to new environments and expand its geographic range. It is alternatively or additionally possible that causal cognition, the ability to understand relationships beyond their statistical covariations, could play a significant role in rapid range expansions via the ability to learn faster: causal cognition could lead to making better predictions about outcomes through exerting more control over events. We aim to determine whether great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus), a species that is rapidly expanding its geographic range, use causal inference and whether this ability relates to their behavioral flexibility (flexibility measured in these individuals by Logan et al. (2019): reversal learning of a color discrimination and solution switching on a puzzle box). Causal cognition was measured using a touchscreen where individuals learned about the relationships between a star, a tone, a clicking noise, and food. They were then tested on their expectations about which of these causes the food to become available. We found that eight grackles showed no evidence of making causal inferences when given the opportunity to intervene on observed events using a touchscreen apparatus, and that performance on the causal cognition task did not correlate with behavioral flexibility measures. This could indicate that our test was inadequate to assess causal cognition. Because of this, we are unable to speculate about the potential role of causal cognition in a species that is rapidly expanding its geographic range. We suggest further exploration of this hypothesis using larger sample sizes and multiple test paradigms.

Published online:
DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.44
Blaisdell, Aaron 1; Seitz, Benjamin 1; Rowney, Carolyn 2; Folsom, Melissa 2; MacPherson, Maggie 3; Deffner, Dominik 2; Logan, Corina J 2

1 University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
2 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
3 University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, USA
     author = {Blaisdell, Aaron and Seitz, Benjamin and Rowney, Carolyn and Folsom, Melissa and MacPherson, Maggie and Deffner, Dominik and Logan, Corina J},
     title = {Do the more flexible individuals rely more on causal cognition? {Observation} versus intervention in causal inference in great-tailed grackles},
     journal = {Peer Community Journal},
     eid = {e50},
     publisher = {Peer Community In},
     volume = {1},
     year = {2021},
     doi = {10.24072/pcjournal.44},
     url = {}
TI  - Do the more flexible individuals rely more on causal cognition? Observation versus intervention in causal inference in great-tailed grackles
JO  - Peer Community Journal
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021///
VL  - 1
PB  - Peer Community In
UR  -
UR  -
DO  - 10.24072/pcjournal.44
ID  - 10_24072_pcjournal_44
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%T Do the more flexible individuals rely more on causal cognition? Observation versus intervention in causal inference in great-tailed grackles
%J Peer Community Journal
%D 2021
%V 1
%I Peer Community In
%R 10.24072/pcjournal.44
%F 10_24072_pcjournal_44
Blaisdell, Aaron; Seitz, Benjamin; Rowney, Carolyn; Folsom, Melissa; MacPherson, Maggie; Deffner, Dominik; Logan, Corina J. Do the more flexible individuals rely more on causal cognition? Observation versus intervention in causal inference in great-tailed grackles. Peer Community Journal, Volume 1 (2021), article  no. e50. doi : 10.24072/pcjournal.44.

Peer reviewed and recommended by PCI : 10.24072/pci.ecology.100076

[1] Balsam, P. D.; Graf, J. S.; Silver, R. Operant and pavlovian contributions to the ontogeny of pecking in ring doves, Developmental Psychobiology, Volume 25 (1992) no. 6, pp. 389-410 | Article

[2] Bateson, M.; Emmerson, M.; Ergün, G.; Monaghan, P.; Nettle, D. Opposite Effects of Early-Life Competition and Developmental Telomere Attrition on Cognitive Biases in Juvenile European Starlings, PLOS ONE, Volume 10 (2015) no. 7 | Article

[3] Blaisdell, A.; Seitz, B.; Rowney, C.; Folsom, M.; MacPherson, M.; Deffner, D.; Logan, C., Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity, Data package, 2021 | Article

[4] Blaisdell, A. P.; Sawa, K.; Leising, K. J.; Waldmann, M. R. Causal Reasoning in Rats, Science, Volume 311 (2006) no. 5763, pp. 1020-1022 | Article

[5] Blaisdell, A. P.; Waldmann, M. R. Rational RatsCausal Inference and Representation, Oxford Handbooks Online, Oxford University Press, 2012 | Article

[6] Bond, A. B.; Kamil, A. C.; Balda, R. P. Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica)., Journal of Comparative Psychology, Volume 121 (2007) no. 4, pp. 372-379 | Article

[7] Chow, P. K. Y.; Lea, S. E.; Leaver, L. A. How practice makes perfect: the role of persistence, flexibility and learning in problem-solving efficiency, Animal Behaviour, Volume 112 (2016), pp. 273-283 | Article

[8] Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge, 1988 | Article

[9] Davis, W. R.; Arnold, K. A. Food Habits of the Great-Tailed Grackle in Brazos County, Texas, The Condor, Volume 74 (1972) no. 4, pp. 439-446 | Article

[10] Deák, G. O.; Wiseheart, M. Cognitive flexibility in young children: General or task-specific capacity?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Volume 138 (2015), pp. 31-53 | Article

[11] Deffner, D.; Kleinow, V.; McElreath, R. Dynamic social learning in temporally and spatially variable environments, Royal Society Open Science, Volume 7 (2020) no. 12 | Article

[12] Doya, K. Reinforcement learning: Computational theory and biological mechanisms, HFSP Journal, Volume 1 (2007) no. 1, pp. 30-40 | Article

[13] Emery, N. J.; Clayton, N. S. Tool use and physical cognition in birds and mammals, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Volume 19 (2009) no. 1, pp. 27-33 | Article

[14] Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses, Behavior Research Methods, Volume 41 (2009) no. 4, pp. 1149-1160 | Article

[15] Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences, Behavior Research Methods, Volume 39 (2007) no. 2, pp. 175-191 | Article

[16] Gamer, M.; Lemon, J.; Gamer, M.; Robinson, A.; Kendall’s, W. Package ‘irr.’ Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement., 2012

[17] Griffin, A. S.; Guez, D. Innovation and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms, Behavioural Processes, Volume 109 (2014), pp. 121-134 | Article

[18] Hadfield, J. D. MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: TheMCMCglmmRPackage, Journal of Statistical Software, Volume 33 (2010) no. 2 | Article

[19] Hadfield, J. MCMCglmm course notes., 2014

[20] Hutcheon, J. A.; Chiolero, A.; Hanley, J. A. Random measurement error and regression dilution bias, BMJ, Volume 340 (2010) | Article

[21] Kangas, B. D.; Bergman, J. Touchscreen technology in the study of cognition-related behavior, Behavioural Pharmacology, Volume 28 (2017) no. 8, pp. 623-629 | Article

[22] Lambert, M. L.; Jacobs, I.; Osvath, M.; von Bayern, A. M. Birds of a feather? Parrot and corvid cognition compared, Behaviour, Volume 156 (2019) no. 5-8, pp. 505-594 | Article

[23] Lefebvre, L.; Whittle, P.; Lascaris, E.; Finkelstein, A. Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds, Animal Behaviour, Volume 53 (1997) no. 3, pp. 549-560 | Article

[24] Leising, K. J.; Wong, J.; Waldmann, M. R.; Blaisdell, A. P. The special status of actions in causal reasoning in rats., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Volume 137 (2008) no. 3, pp. 514-527 | Article

[25] Logan, C. J. Behavioral flexibility and problem solving in an invasive bird, PeerJ, Volume 4 (2016) | Article

[26] Logan, C.; MacPherson, M.; Rowney, C.; Bergeron, L.; Seitz, B.; Blaisdell, A.; Folsom, M.; Johnson-Ulrich, Z.; McCune, K. Is behavioral flexibility manipulatable and, if so, does it improve flexibility and problem solving in a new context?, In principle acceptance by PCI Ecology of the version on 26 Mar 2019 (2019)

[27] Logan, C. J.; McCune, K.; MacPherson, M.; Johnson-Ulrich, Z.; Rowney, C.; Seitz, B.; Blaisdell, A.; Deffner, D.; Wascher, C. Are the more flexible great-tailed grackles also better at behavioral inhibition?, PsyArXiv Preprints (2021) | Article

[28] McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A bayesian course with examples in r and stan, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2016 | Article

[29] Mikhalevich, I.; Powell, R.; Logan, C. Is behavioural flexibility evidence of cognitive complexity? How evolution can inform comparative cognition, Interface Focus, Volume 7 (2017) no. 3 | Article

[30] Peirce, J. W. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Volume 2 (2009) | Article

[31] Premack, D.; Premack, A. J. Levels of causal understanding in chimpanzees and children, Cognition, Volume 50 (1994) no. 1-3, pp. 347-362 | Article

[32] R Core Team, , R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017

[33] Schmitt, V. Implementing new portable touchscreen-setups to enhance cognitive research and enrich zoo-housed animals, bioRxiv, Volume 316042 (2018) | Article

[34] Seitz, B. M.; McCune, K.; MacPherson, M.; Bergeron, L.; Blaisdell, A. P.; Logan, C. J. Using touchscreen equipped operant chambers to study animal cognition. Benefits, limitations, and advice, PLOS ONE, Volume 16 (2021) no. 2 | Article

[35] Sol, D.; Duncan, R. P.; Blackburn, T. M.; Cassey, P.; Lefebvre, L. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume 102 (2005) no. 15, pp. 5460-5465 | Article

[36] Sol, D.; Lefebvre, L. Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand, Oikos, Volume 90 (2000) no. 3, pp. 599-605 | Article

[37] Sol, D.; Timmermans, S.; Lefebvre, L. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds, Animal Behaviour, Volume 63 (2002) no. 3, pp. 495-502 | Article

[38] Timberlake, W. Behavior systems, associationism, and Pavlovian conditioning, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Volume 1 (1994) no. 4, pp. 405-420 | Article

[39] Tomasello, M.; Call, J. Primate cognition, Oxford University Press, 1997

[40] Völter, C. J.; Call, J. Causal and inferential reasoning in animals., APA handbook of comparative psychology: Perception, learning, and cognition., American Psychological Association, Washington, 2017, pp. 643-671 | Article

[41] Waldmann, M. R. Knowledge-Based Causal Induction, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Elsevier, 1996, pp. 47-88 | Article

[42] Waldmann, M. R.; Hagmayer, Y. Seeing Versus Doing: Two Modes of Accessing Causal Knowledge., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Volume 31 (2005) no. 2, pp. 216-227 | Article

[43] Wehtje, W. The range expansion of the great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus Gmelin) in North America since 1880, Journal of Biogeography, Volume 30 (2003) no. 10, pp. 1593-1607 | Article

[44] Zuur, A. F.; Ieno, E. N.; Walker, N.; Saveliev, A. A.; Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Statistics for Biology and Health, Springer New York, New York, NY, 2009 | Article

Cited by Sources: