Section: Animal Science
Topic: Agricultural sciences, Applied biological sciences

Combining several indicators to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms

Levallois, Pierre1 ; Leblanc-Maridor, Mily1; Scollo, Annalisa2 ; Ferrari, Paolo3 ; Belloc, Catherine1 ; Fourichon, Christine1  
1 Oniris, INRAE, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France
2 University of Torino, 10095 Torino, Italy
3 CRPA, 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy

Corresponding author(s): Fourichon, Christine (christine.fourichon@oniris-nantes.fr)

10.24072/pcjournal.318 - Peer Community Journal, Volume 3 (2023), article no. e86.

Get full text PDF Peer reviewed and recommended by PCI
article image

A tailor-made health plan is a set of recommendations for a farmer to achieve and maintain a high health and welfare status. Tailored to each farm, it is intended to be an effective way of triggering change. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms, designed in various situations after a systematic biosecurity and herd health audit. An intervention study was carried out in 20 farrow-to-finish pig farms. An initial standardized audit and discussion between the farm veterinarian and the farmer resulted in a specific plan. Compliance with recommendations was monitored during 8 months. Changes in health, performances and antimicrobial use were monitored. We defined two categories of plans: i) 14 plans targeting a given health disorder present in a farm; ii) 17 plans to improve prevention, not targeting a specific health disorder (a farm could have both types of plans). A small number of priority recommendations were made per farm. In 18 farms, farmers implemented 1 to 4 recommendations (none in 2 farms). Of the 17 non-disorder-specific plans, 11 were considered effective (>50% recommendations implemented), 3 intermediate (at least one but less than half of the recommendations implemented) and 3 ineffective (no implementation). Of the 14 disorder-specific plans, 9 were followed with full or good compliance (>50% recommendations implemented), 2 with intermediate compliance (1 recommendation implemented out of 2) and 3 with no compliance (no recommendation implemented). When at least one recommendation was implemented, change in clinical, performance and antimicrobial use indicators was assessed if a biological association with the disorder was deemed plausible and if their initial value showed room for improvement. Improvement was evidenced 4/9, 1/6 and 1/6 times for these indicators, respectively. Independently, veterinarians concluded that 8/14 plans were effective. Overall, tailor-made health plans were effective in triggering changes in farm management. Three key points were identified for future assessments of the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans. Compliance should be the first indicator of assessment. Outcome indicators and their monitoring periods should be adapted to each farm and to the targeted health disorder. Indicators should be combined to have a holistic description of the evolution of a health disorder. Further research is needed to identify how to select indicators to combine and how to combine them, according to health disorders.

Published online:
DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.318
Type: Research article
Keywords: biosecurity, pig, effectiveness, assessment, indicators, performance, antimicrobial use

Levallois, Pierre 1; Leblanc-Maridor, Mily 1; Scollo, Annalisa 2; Ferrari, Paolo 3; Belloc, Catherine 1; Fourichon, Christine 1

1 Oniris, INRAE, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France
2 University of Torino, 10095 Torino, Italy
3 CRPA, 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy
License: CC-BY 4.0
Copyrights: The authors retain unrestricted copyrights and publishing rights 
@article{10_24072_pcjournal_318,
     author = {Levallois, Pierre and Leblanc-Maridor, Mily and Scollo, Annalisa and Ferrari, Paolo and Belloc, Catherine and Fourichon, Christine},
     title = {Combining several indicators to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms},
     journal = {Peer Community Journal},
     eid = {e86},
     publisher = {Peer Community In},
     volume = {3},
     year = {2023},
     doi = {10.24072/pcjournal.318},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.318/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Levallois, Pierre
AU  - Leblanc-Maridor, Mily
AU  - Scollo, Annalisa
AU  - Ferrari, Paolo
AU  - Belloc, Catherine
AU  - Fourichon, Christine
TI  - Combining several indicators to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms
JO  - Peer Community Journal
PY  - 2023
VL  - 3
PB  - Peer Community In
UR  - https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.318/
DO  - 10.24072/pcjournal.318
LA  - en
ID  - 10_24072_pcjournal_318
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Levallois, Pierre
%A Leblanc-Maridor, Mily
%A Scollo, Annalisa
%A Ferrari, Paolo
%A Belloc, Catherine
%A Fourichon, Christine
%T Combining several indicators to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms
%J Peer Community Journal
%D 2023
%V 3
%I Peer Community In
%U https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.318/
%R 10.24072/pcjournal.318
%G en
%F 10_24072_pcjournal_318
Levallois, Pierre; Leblanc-Maridor, Mily; Scollo, Annalisa; Ferrari, Paolo; Belloc, Catherine; Fourichon, Christine. Combining several indicators to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms. Peer Community Journal, Volume 3 (2023), article  no. e86. doi : 10.24072/pcjournal.318. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.318/

PCI peer reviews and recommendation, and links to data, scripts, code and supplementary information: 10.24072/pci.animsci.100195

Conflict of interest of the recommender and peer reviewers:
The recommender in charge of the evaluation of the article and the reviewers declared that they have no conflict of interest (as defined in the code of conduct of PCI) with the authors or with the content of the article.

[1] Alarcon, P.; Wieland, B.; Mateus, A. L.; Dewberry, C. Pig farmers’ perceptions, attitudes, influences and management of information in the decision-making process for disease control, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 116 (2014) no. 3, pp. 223-242 | DOI

[2] Alarcón, L. V.; Allepuz, A.; Mateu, E. Biosecurity in pig farms: a review, Porcine Health Management, Volume 7 (2021) no. 1, p. 5 | DOI

[3] Bard, A. M.; Main, D.; Roe, E.; Haase, A.; Whay, H. R.; Reyher, K. K. To change or not to change? Veterinarian and farmer perceptions of relational factors influencing the enactment of veterinary advice on dairy farms in the United Kingdom, Journal of Dairy Science, Volume 102 (2019) no. 11, pp. 10379-10394 | DOI

[4] Blanco-Penedo, I.; Sjöström, K.; Jones, P.; Krieger, M.; Duval, J.; van Soest, F.; Sundrum, A.; Emanuelson, U. Structural characteristics of organic dairy farms in four European countries and their association with the implementation of animal health plans, Agricultural Systems, Volume 173 (2019), pp. 244-253 | DOI

[5] Chincarini, M. Evaluating tailor-made health plans in pig farms: a multiple complementary indicators approach, Peer Community in Animal Science (2023) | DOI

[6] Clark, B.; Panzone, L. A.; Stewart, G. B.; Kyriazakis, I.; Niemi, J. K.; Latvala, T.; Tranter, R.; Jones, P.; Frewer, L. J. Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems, PLOS ONE, Volume 14 (2019) no. 1, p. e0210432 | DOI

[7] Collineau, L.; Rojo-Gimeno, C.; Léger, A.; Backhans, A.; Loesken, S.; Nielsen, E.; Postma, M.; Emanuelson, U.; Beilage, E.; Sjölund, M.; Wauters, E.; Stärk, K.; Dewulf, J.; Belloc, C.; Krebs, S. Herd-specific interventions to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardising technical and economic performance, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 144 (2017), pp. 167-178 | DOI

[8] Delpont, M.; Racicot, M.; Durivage, A.; Fornili, L.; Guerin, J.; Vaillancourt, J.; Paul, M. C. Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Volume 68 (2021) no. 1, pp. 51-61 | DOI

[9] Dixon, L.; Sun, H.; Roberts, H. African swine fever, Antiviral Research, Volume 165 (2019), pp. 34-41 | DOI

[10] Duval, J.; Bareille, N.; Madouasse, A.; de Joybert, M.; Sjöström, K.; Emanuelson, U.; Bonnet-Beaugrand, F.; Fourichon, C. Evaluation of the impact of a Herd Health and Production Management programme in organic dairy cattle farms: a process evaluation approach, Animal, Volume 12 (2018) no. 7, pp. 1475-1483 | DOI

[11] Duval, J.; Fourichon, C.; Madouasse, A.; Sjöström, K.; Emanuelson, U.; Bareille, N. A participatory approach to design monitoring indicators of production diseases in organic dairy farms, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 128 (2016), pp. 12-22 | DOI

[12] European Medicines Agency Principles on assignment of defined daily dose for animals (DDDvet) and defined course dose for animals (DCDvet), 2015 (http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/ 2015/06/WC500188890.pdf)

[13] FAO The 3-Zone Biosecurity Model, 2015 (https://www.fao.org/indonesia/programmes-and-projects/ectad-indonesia/successful-practices/en/)

[14] Fraser, D.; Weary, D. M.; Pajor, E. A.; Milligan, B. N. A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns, Animal welfare, Volume 6 (1997), pp. 187-205

[15] Garforth, C. Livestock Keepers' Reasons for Doing and Not Doing Things Which Governments, Vets and Scientists Would Like Them to Do, Zoonoses and Public Health, Volume 62 (2015), pp. 29-38 | DOI

[16] Garforth, C.; Bailey, A.; Tranter, R. Farmers’ attitudes to disease risk management in England: A comparative analysis of sheep and pig farmers, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 110 (2013) no. 3-4, pp. 456-466 | DOI

[17] Holtkamp, D.; Kliebenstein, J.; Neumann, E.; Zimmerman, J.; Rotto, H.; Yoder, T.; Wang, C.; Yeske, P.; Mowrer, C.; Haley, C. Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers, Journal of Swine Health and Production, Volume 21 (2013) no. 2, pp. 72-84

[18] Huber, N.; Andraud, M.; Sassu, E. L.; Prigge, C.; Zoche-Golob, V.; Käsbohrer, A.; D'Angelantonio, D.; Viltrop, A.; Żmudzki, J.; Jones, H.; Smith, R. P.; Tobias, T.; Burow, E. What is a biosecurity measure? A definition proposal for animal production and linked processing operations, One Health, Volume 15 (2022) | DOI

[19] Ivemeyer, S.; Smolders, G.; Brinkmann, J.; Gratzer, E.; Hansen, B.; Henriksen, B.; Huber, J.; Leeb, C.; March, S.; Mejdell, C.; Nicholas, P.; Roderick, S.; Stöger, E.; Vaarst, M.; Whistance, L.; Winckler, C.; Walkenhorst, M. Impact of animal health and welfare planning on medicine use, herd health and production in European organic dairy farms, Livestock Science, Volume 145 (2012) no. 1-3, pp. 63-72 | DOI

[20] Jones, P.; Sok, J.; Tranter, R.; Blanco-Penedo, I.; Fall, N.; Fourichon, C.; Hogeveen, H.; Krieger, M.; Sundrum, A. Assessing, and understanding, European organic dairy farmers’ intentions to improve herd health, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 133 (2016), pp. 84-96 | DOI

[21] Kristensen, E.; Jakobsen, E. B. Challenging the myth of the irrational dairy farmer; understanding decision-making related to herd health, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 59 (2011) no. 1, pp. 1-7 | DOI

[22] Lam, T.; Jansen, J.; van den Borne, B.; Renes, R.; Hogeveen, H. What veterinarians need to know about communication to optimise their role as advisors on udder health in dairy herds, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Volume 59 (2011) no. 1, pp. 8-15 | DOI

[23] Levallois, P.; Leblanc-Maridor, M.; Scollo, A.; Ferrari, P.; Belloc, C.; Fourichon, C. Raw_data_Combining several indicators to assess the effectiveness of tailor-made health plans in pig farms [Data set], Zenodo, 2023 | DOI

[24] Levallois, P.; Leblanc-Maridor, M.; Belloc, C.; Fourichon, C. From biosecurity audit to tailor-made recommendations in pig farms: how to prioritize action points?, 73rd EAAP meeting, Porto, 2022

[25] Lun, Z.-R.; Wang, Q.-P.; Chen, X.-G.; Li, A.-X.; Zhu, X.-Q. Streptococcus suis: an emerging zoonotic pathogen, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Volume 7 (2007) no. 3, pp. 201-209 | DOI

[26] Maes, D.; Sibila, M.; Kuhnert, P.; Segalés, J.; Haesebrouck, F.; Pieters, M. Update on Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs: Knowledge gaps for improved disease control, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Volume 65 (2018), pp. 110-124 | DOI

[27] Martín, P.; Czycholl, I.; Buxadé, C.; Krieter, J. Validation of a multi-criteria evaluation model for animal welfare, Animal, Volume 11 (2017) no. 4, pp. 650-660 | DOI

[28] May, S. A. Clinical Reasoning and Case-Based Decision Making: The Fundamental Challenge to Veterinary Educators, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Volume 40 (2013), pp. 200-209 | DOI

[29] Moya, S.; Tirado, F.; Espluga, J.; Ciaravino, G.; Armengol, R.; Diéguez, J.; Yus, E.; Benavides, B.; Casal, J.; Allepuz, A. Dairy farmers decision-making to implement biosecurity measures, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Volume 67 (2020), pp. 698-710 | DOI

[30] Nathues, H.; Alarcon, P.; Rushton, J.; Jolie, R.; Fiebig, K.; Jimenez, M.; Geurts, V.; Nathues, C. Cost of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus at individual farm level – An economic disease model, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 142 (2017), pp. 16-29 | DOI

[31] OIE Introduction to the recommendations for animal welfare, Terrestrail animal health code, Volume 1, 2022, p. 800 (https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_introduction.pdf)

[32] Postma, M.; Vanderhaeghen, W.; Sarrazin, S.; Maes, D.; Dewulf, J. Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Pig Production without Jeopardizing Production Parameters, Zoonoses and Public Health, Volume 64 (2017) no. 1, pp. 63-74 | DOI

[33] Raasch, S.; Collineau, L.; Postma, M.; Backhans, A.; Sjölund, M.; Belloc, C.; Emanuelson, U.; Beilage, E. g.; Stärk, K.; Dewulf, J.; on the behalf of the MINAPIG Consortium Effectiveness of alternative measures to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig production in four European countries, Porcine Health Management, Volume 6 (2020) no. 1, p. 6 | DOI

[34] Racicot, M.; Venne, D.; Durivage, A.; Vaillancourt, J.-P. Evaluation of the relationship between personality traits, experience, education and biosecurity compliance on poultry farms in Québec, Canada, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 103 (2012) no. 2-3, pp. 201-207 | DOI

[35] Renault, V.; Damiaans, B.; Humblet, M.; Jiménez Ruiz, S.; García Bocanegra, I.; Brennan, M. L.; Casal, J.; Petit, E.; Pieper, L.; Simoneit, C.; Tourette, I.; Wuyckhuise, L.; Sarrazin, S.; Dewulf, J.; Saegerman, C. Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity measures and the main predictors of behaviour change: The first European‐wide pilot study, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Volume 68 (2021) no. 6, pp. 3305-3319 | DOI

[36] Ritter, C.; Jansen, J.; Roche, S.; Kelton, D. F.; Adams, C. L.; Orsel, K.; Erskine, R. J.; Benedictus, G.; Lam, T. J.; Barkema, H. W. Invited review: Determinants of farmers' adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control, Journal of Dairy Science, Volume 100 (2017) no. 5, pp. 3329-3347 | DOI

[37] Rojo-Gimeno, C.; Postma, M.; Dewulf, J.; Hogeveen, H.; Lauwers, L.; Wauters, E. Farm-economic analysis of reducing antimicrobial use whilst adopting improved management strategies on farrow-to-finish pig farms, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 129 (2016), pp. 74-87 | DOI

[38] Roskam, J.; Lansink, A. O.; Saatkamp, H. The technical and economic impact of veterinary interventions aimed at reducing antimicrobial use on broiler farms, Poultry Science, Volume 98 (2019) no. 12, pp. 6644-6658 | DOI

[39] République Française Arrêté du 16 octobre 2018 relatif aux mesures de biosécurité applicables dans les exploitations détenant des suidés dans le cadre de la prévention de la peste porcine africaine et des autres dangers sanitaires réglementés, 2018, pp. 70-75 (https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000037501487)

[40] République Française Arrêté du 27 juillet 2017 fixant les conditions de production communes relatives à la production en label rouge "porc" - Annexe, 2017, p. 25

[41] Scollo, A.; Levallois, P.; Fourichon, C.; Motta, A.; Mannelli, A.; Lombardo, F.; Ferrari, P. Monitoring Means and Results of Biosecurity in Pig Fattening Farms: Systematic Assessment of Measures in Place and Exploration of Biomarkers of Interest, Animals, Volume 12 (2022) no. 19, p. 2655 | DOI

[42] Silva, G. S.; Corbellini, L. G.; Linhares, D. L.; Baker, K. L.; Holtkamp, D. J. Development and validation of a scoring system to assess the relative vulnerability of swine breeding herds to the introduction of PRRS virus, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 160 (2018), pp. 116-122 | DOI

[43] Simon-Grifé, M.; Martín-Valls, G.; Vilar, M.; García-Bocanegra, I.; Martín, M.; Mateu, E.; Casal, J. Biosecurity practices in Spanish pig herds: Perceptions of farmers and veterinarians of the most important biosecurity measures, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 110 (2013) no. 2, pp. 223-231 | DOI

[44] Sjöström, K.; Sternberg-Lewerin, S.; Blanco-Penedo, I.; Duval, J.; Krieger, M.; Emanuelson, U.; Fall, N. Effects of a participatory approach, with systematic impact matrix analysis in herd health planning in organic dairy cattle herds, Animal, Volume 13 (2019) no. 2, pp. 358-366 | DOI

[45] Svensson, C.; Lind, N.; Reyher, K.; Bard, A.; Emanuelson, U. Trust, feasibility, and priorities influence Swedish dairy farmers' adherence and nonadherence to veterinary advice, Journal of Dairy Science, Volume 102 (2019) no. 11, pp. 10360-10368 | DOI

[46] Tremetsberger, L.; Winckler, C. Effectiveness of animal health and welfare planning in dairy herds: a review, Animal Welfare, Volume 24 (2015) no. 1, pp. 55-67 | DOI

[47] Vaarst, M.; Winckler, C.; Roderick, S.; Smolders, G.; Ivemeyer, S.; Brinkmann, J.; Mejdell, C.; Whistance, L.; Nicholas, P.; Walkenhorst, M.; Leeb, C.; March, S.; Henriksen, B.; Stöger, E.; Gratzer, E.; Hansen, B.; Huber, J. Animal Health and Welfare Planning in Organic Dairy Cattle Farms, The Open Veterinary Science Journal, Volume 5 (2011) no. 1, pp. 19-25 | DOI

[48] Valeeva, N.; van Asseldonk, M.; Backus, G. Perceived risk and strategy efficacy as motivators of risk management strategy adoption to prevent animal diseases in pig farming, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 102 (2011) no. 4, pp. 284-295 | DOI

[49] Vinten, C. E.; Cobb, K. A.; Freeman, S. L.; Mossop, L. H. An Investigation into the Clinical Reasoning Development of Veterinary Students, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Volume 43 (2016) no. 4, pp. 398-405 | DOI

[50] Zimmerman, J.; Karriker, L.; Ramirez, A.; Schwartz, K.; Stevenson, G.; Zhang, J. Diseases of Swine, Wiley Blackwell, 2019

Cited by Sources:

block.super