Section: Microbiology
Topic:
Microbiology,
Applied biological sciences
Comparison of metabarcoding taxonomic markers to describe fungal communities in fermented foods
Corresponding author(s): Sicard, Delphine (delphine.sicard@inrae.fr)
10.24072/pcjournal.321 - Peer Community Journal, Volume 3 (2023), article no. e97.
Get full text PDF Peer reviewed and recommended by PCINext generation sequencing offers several ways to study microbial communities. For agri-food sciences, identifying species in diverse food ecosystems is key for both food sustainability and food security. The aim of this study was to compare metabarcoding pipelines and markers to determine fungal diversity in food ecosystems, from Illumina short reads. We built mock communities combining the most representative fungal species in fermented meat, cheese, wine and bread. Four barcodes (ITS1, ITS2, D1/D2 and RPB2) were tested for each mock and on real fermented products. We created a database, including all mock species sequences for each barcode to compensate for the lack of curated data in available databases. Four bioinformatics tools (DADA2, QIIME, FROGS and a combination of DADA2 and FROGS) were compared. Our results clearly showed that the combined DADA2 and FROGS tool gave the most accurate results. Most mock community species were not identified by the RPB2 barcode due to unsuccessful barcode amplification. When comparing the three rDNA markers, ITS markers performed better than D1/D2, as they are better represented in public databases and have better specificity to distinguish species. Between ITS1 and ITS2, differences in the best marker were observed according to the studied ecosystem. While ITS2 is best suited to characterize cheese, wine and fermented meat communities, ITS1 performs better for sourdough bread communities. Our results also emphasized the need for a dedicated database and enriched fungal-specific public databases with novel barcode sequences for 118 major species in food ecosystems.
Type: Research article
Rué, Olivier 1, 2; Coton, Monika 3; Dugat-Bony, Eric 4; Howell, Kate 5; Irlinger, Françoise 4; Legras, Jean-Luc 6; Loux, Valentin 1, 2; Michel, Elisa 6; Mounier, Jérôme 3; Neuvéglise, Cécile 6; Sicard, Delphine 6
@article{10_24072_pcjournal_321, author = {Ru\'e, Olivier and Coton, Monika and Dugat-Bony, Eric and Howell, Kate and Irlinger, Fran\c{c}oise and Legras, Jean-Luc and Loux, Valentin and Michel, Elisa and Mounier, J\'er\^ome and Neuv\'eglise, C\'ecile and Sicard, Delphine}, title = {Comparison of metabarcoding taxonomic markers to describe fungal communities in fermented foods}, journal = {Peer Community Journal}, eid = {e97}, publisher = {Peer Community In}, volume = {3}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.24072/pcjournal.321}, language = {en}, url = {https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.321/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Rué, Olivier AU - Coton, Monika AU - Dugat-Bony, Eric AU - Howell, Kate AU - Irlinger, Françoise AU - Legras, Jean-Luc AU - Loux, Valentin AU - Michel, Elisa AU - Mounier, Jérôme AU - Neuvéglise, Cécile AU - Sicard, Delphine TI - Comparison of metabarcoding taxonomic markers to describe fungal communities in fermented foods JO - Peer Community Journal PY - 2023 VL - 3 PB - Peer Community In UR - https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.321/ DO - 10.24072/pcjournal.321 LA - en ID - 10_24072_pcjournal_321 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Rué, Olivier %A Coton, Monika %A Dugat-Bony, Eric %A Howell, Kate %A Irlinger, Françoise %A Legras, Jean-Luc %A Loux, Valentin %A Michel, Elisa %A Mounier, Jérôme %A Neuvéglise, Cécile %A Sicard, Delphine %T Comparison of metabarcoding taxonomic markers to describe fungal communities in fermented foods %J Peer Community Journal %D 2023 %V 3 %I Peer Community In %U https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.321/ %R 10.24072/pcjournal.321 %G en %F 10_24072_pcjournal_321
Rué, Olivier; Coton, Monika; Dugat-Bony, Eric; Howell, Kate; Irlinger, Françoise; Legras, Jean-Luc; Loux, Valentin; Michel, Elisa; Mounier, Jérôme; Neuvéglise, Cécile; Sicard, Delphine. Comparison of metabarcoding taxonomic markers to describe fungal communities in fermented foods. Peer Community Journal, Volume 3 (2023), article no. e97. doi : 10.24072/pcjournal.321. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.321/
PCI peer reviews and recommendation, and links to data, scripts, code and supplementary information: 10.24072/pci.microbiol.100007
Conflict of interest of the recommender and peer reviewers:
The recommender in charge of the evaluation of the article and the reviewers declared that they have no conflict of interest (as defined in the code of conduct of PCI) with the authors or with the content of the article.
[1] Great differences in performance and outcome of high-throughput sequencing data analysis platforms for fungal metabarcoding, MycoKeys, Volume 39 (2018), pp. 29-40 | DOI
[2] FROGS: a powerful tool to analyse the diversity of fungi with special management of internal transcribed spacers, Briefings in Bioinformatics, Volume 22 (2021) no. 6, p. bbab318 | DOI
[3] Molds, Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry (2014), pp. 147-153
[4] Improved Selection of Internal Transcribed Spacer-Specific Primers Enables Quantitative, Ultra-High-Throughput Profiling of Fungal Communities, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 79 (2013) no. 8, pp. 2519-2526 | DOI
[5] Monitoring Seasonal Changes in Winery-Resident Microbiota, PLoS ONE, Volume 8 (2013) no. 6 | DOI
[6] Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2, Nature Biotechnology, Volume 37 (2019) no. 8, pp. 852-857 | DOI
[7] DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines, Bulletin of Entomological Research, Volume 105 (2015) no. 6, pp. 717-727 | DOI
[8] Analyses of ITS and LSU gene regions provide congruent results on fungal community responses, Fungal Ecology, Volume 9 (2014), pp. 65-68 | DOI
[9] Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis, The ISME Journal, Volume 11 (2017) no. 12, pp. 2639-2643 | DOI
[10] DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data, Nature Methods, Volume 13 (2016) no. 7, pp. 581-583 | DOI
[11] Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms, The ISME Journal, Volume 6 (2012) no. 8, pp. 1621-1624 | DOI
[12] Performance of Microbiome Sequence Inference Methods in Environments with Varying Biomass, mSystems, Volume 4 (2019) no. 1, pp. e00163-18 | DOI
[13] Microbial Ecology of French Dry Fermented Sausages and Mycotoxin Risk Evaluation During Storage, Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 12 (2021) | DOI
[14] Different Amplicon Targets for Sequencing-Based Studies of Fungal Diversity, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 83 (2017) no. 17, pp. e00905-17 | DOI
[15] Overview of a surface-ripened cheese community functioning by meta-omics analyses, PloS One, Volume 10 (2015) no. 4, p. e0124360 | DOI
[16] Rapid and real-time identification of fungi up to species level with long amplicon nanopore sequencing from clinical samples, Biology Methods and Protocols, Volume 6 (2020) no. 1 | DOI
[17] Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST, Bioinformatics, Volume 26 (2010) no. 19, pp. 2460-2461 | DOI
[18] FROGS: Find, Rapidly, OTUs with Galaxy Solution, Bioinformatics, Volume 34 (2018) no. 8, pp. 1287-1294 | DOI
[19] Species identification and quantification in meat and meat products using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), Food Chemistry, Volume 173 (2015), pp. 1054-1058 | DOI
[20] Mycobiota dynamics and mycotoxin detection in PGI Salame Piemonte, Journal of Applied Microbiology, Volume 131 (2021) no. 5, pp. 2336-2350
[21] ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes–application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts, Molecular Ecology, Volume 2 (1993) no. 2, pp. 113-118
[22] From grape berries to wine: population dynamics of cultivable yeasts associated to “Nero di Troia” autochthonous grape cultivar, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Volume 32 (2016) no. 4 | DOI
[23] Broadscale Ecological Patterns Are Robust to Use of Exact Sequence Variants versus Operational Taxonomic Units, mSphere, Volume 3 (2018) no. 4, pp. e00148-18 | DOI
[24] PIPITS: an automated pipeline for analyses of fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences from the Illumina sequencing platform, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Volume 6 (2015) no. 8, pp. 973-980 | DOI
[25] New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region – evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Volume 82 (2012) no. 3, pp. 666-677 | DOI
[26] Cheese rind microbial communities: diversity, composition and origin, FEMS Microbiology Letters, Volume 362 (2014) no. 2, pp. 1-11 | DOI
[27] The Occurrence of Non-Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Species Over Three Vintages in Four Vineyards and Grape Musts From Four Production Regions of the Western Cape, South Africa, South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Volume 24 (2003) no. 2 | DOI
[28] Multiple Alignment of DNA Sequences with MAFFT, Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis (Methods in Molecular Biology), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2009, pp. 39-64
[29] Does Intraspecific Variation in rDNA Copy Number Affect Analysis of Microbial Communities?, Trends in Microbiology, Volume 29 (2021) no. 1, pp. 19-27 | DOI
[30] Fermented-Food Metagenomics Reveals Substrate-Associated Differences in Taxonomy and Health-Associated and Antibiotic Resistance Determinants, mSystems, Volume 5 (2020) no. 6, pp. e00522-20 | DOI
[31] A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents, Frontiers in Zoology, Volume 10 (2013) no. 1, p. 34 | DOI
[32] DAnIEL: A User-Friendly Web Server for Fungal ITS Amplicon Sequencing Data, Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 12 (2021) | DOI
[33] Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads, EMBnet.journal, Volume 17 (2011) no. 1, pp. 10-12 | DOI
[34] Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Volume 35 (2005) no. 1, pp. 1-20 | DOI
[35] Traditional cheeses: Rich and diverse microbiota with associated benefits, International journal of food microbiology, Volume 177 (2014), pp. 136-154 | DOI
[36] Metataxonomic comparison between internal transcribed spacer and 26S ribosomal large subunit (LSU) rDNA gene, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Volume 290 (2019), pp. 132-140 | DOI
[37] Mycobiome diversity: high-throughput sequencing and identification of fungi, Nature Reviews Microbiology, Volume 17 (2019) no. 2, pp. 95-109 | DOI
[38] The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 47 (2019) no. D1, p. D259-D264 | DOI
[39] Fusarium and its near relatives, 1993, pp. 225-233
[40] LotuS2: an ultrafast and highly accurate tool for amplicon sequencing analysis, Microbiome, Volume 10 (2022) no. 1, p. 176 | DOI
[41] FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments, PLoS ONE, Volume 5 (2010) no. 3, p. e9490 | DOI
[42] The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 41 (2013) no. D1, p. D590-D596 | DOI
[43] METABARFOOD - Description of the sequences used in mock communities, Recherche Data Gouv, V1, 2022a | DOI
[44] METABARFOOD - Results on mock communities, choice of the bioinformatics solution, Recherche Data Gouv, V1, 2022b | DOI
[45] METABARFOOD - Results on real communities, Recherche Data Gouv, V1, 2022c | DOI
[46] METABARFOOD - Comparison of amplicons, Recherche Data Gouv, V1, 2022d | DOI
[47] METABARFOOD - Complementary analyses, Recherche Data Gouv, V1, 2022e | DOI
[48] Repository containing source code and scripts used for the METABARFOOD project, HAL, 2023 (HAL https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04212255)
[49] Exploring the phenotypic space of non-Saccharomyces wine yeast biodiversity, Food microbiology, Volume 55 (2016), pp. 32-46 | DOI
[50] Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 50 (2022) no. D1, p. D20-D26 | DOI
[51] phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R, Bioinformatics, Volume 27 (2011) no. 4, pp. 592-593 | DOI
[52] Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume 109 (2012) no. 16, pp. 6241-6246 | DOI
[53] Yeasts, Handbook of fermented meat and poultry (2014), pp. 139-146
[54] Sequence-based analysis of the Vitis vinifera L. cv Cabernet Sauvignon grape must mycobiome in three South African vineyards employing distinct agronomic systems, Frontiers in microbiology, Volume 6 (2015), p. 1358 | DOI
[55] The vineyard yeast microbiome, a mixed model microbial map, PLoS One, Volume 7 (2012) no. 12, p. e52609 | DOI
[56] TaxonKit: A practical and efficient NCBI taxonomy toolkit, Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Special issue on Microbiome), Volume 48 (2021) no. 9, pp. 844-850 | DOI
[57] Next-generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research, Molecular Ecology, Volume 21 (2012) no. 8, pp. 1794-1805 | DOI
[58] A combined meta-barcoding and shotgun metagenomic analysis of spontaneous wine fermentation, GigaScience, Volume 6 (2017) no. 7, p. gix040 | DOI
[59] Towards a more accurate metabarcoding approach for studying fungal communities of fermented foods, Peer Community in Microbiology (2023) | DOI
[60] Fungal identification biases in microbiome projects, Environmental microbiology reports, Volume 8 (2016) no. 5, pp. 774-779 | DOI
[61] High-Coverage ITS Primers for the DNA-Based Identification of Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes in Environmental Samples, PLoS ONE, Volume 7 (2012) no. 7 | DOI
[62] Taxonomy, Biodiversity, and Physiology of Sourdough Yeasts, Handbook on Sourdough Biotechnology, Springer, 2023, pp. 161-212
[63] Microbial community dispersal from wheat grains to sourdoughs: A contribution of participatory research, Molecular Ecology (2022), pp. mec-16630 | DOI
[64] DNA barcoding analysis of more than 9 000 yeast isolates contributes to quantitative thresholds for yeast species and genera delimitation, Studies in Mycology, Volume 85 (2016), pp. 91-105 | DOI
[65] The rpb2 gene represents a viable alternative molecular marker for the analysis of environmental fungal communities, Molecular Ecology Resources, Volume 16 (2016) no. 2, pp. 388-401 | DOI
[66] YeastIP: a database for identification and phylogeny of Saccharomycotina yeasts, FEMS Yeast Research, Volume 13 (2013) no. 1, pp. 117-125 | DOI
[67] Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, 1990, pp. 315-322
[68] Evaluation of the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), specifically ITS1 and ITS2, for the analysis of fungal diversity by deep sequencing, PLOS ONE, Volume 13 (2018) no. 10, p. e0206428 | DOI
[69] Absolute quantitation of microbes using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding: A rapid normalization of relative abundances by quantitative PCR targeting a 16S rRNA gene spike-in standard, MicrobiologyOpen, Volume 9 (2020) no. 3, p. e977 | DOI
[70] Evaluation of different 16S rRNA gene V regions for exploring bacterial diversity in a eutrophic freshwater lake, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 618 (2018), pp. 1254-1267 | DOI
[71] A Combined Digital PCR and Next Generation DNA-Sequencing Based Approach for Tracking Nearshore Pollutant Dynamics Along the Southwest United States/Mexico Border, Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 12 (2021) | DOI
Cited by Sources: